<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pay Per Click Advertising and SEO &#187; Comments Boards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.topclickmedia.co.uk/pay-per-click-advertising-blog/category/comments-boards/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.topclickmedia.co.uk/pay-per-click-advertising-blog</link>
	<description>A Great Resource On Information Relating To Search Engine Marketing, Including Pay Per Click and SEO.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 16:00:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Guardian Website Ditches JavaScript for SEO Reasons</title>
		<link>http://www.topclickmedia.co.uk/pay-per-click-advertising-blog/the-guardian-website-ditches-javascript-for-seo-reasons</link>
		<comments>http://www.topclickmedia.co.uk/pay-per-click-advertising-blog/the-guardian-website-ditches-javascript-for-seo-reasons#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Oliver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comments Boards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[javascript]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.topclickmedia.co.uk/pay-per-click-advertising-blog/?p=1352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The debate surrounding the relative SEO benefits or hindrances of Java script for SEO rages on with the news that the Guardian website has dropped all JavaScript on its comments board. Apparently the decision was taken, at least partly in order to enhance its search engine performance. So, will this help?
Well, quite possibly. The pages [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.topclickmedia.co.uk/pay-per-click-advertising-blog/guardian-jobs-site-compromised' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Guardian Jobs Site compromised'>Guardian Jobs Site compromised</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.topclickmedia.co.uk/pay-per-click-advertising-blog/7-ways-to-increase-sales-by-increasing-speed-part-6' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: 7 Ways to Increase Sales By Increasing Speed &#8211; Part 6'>7 Ways to Increase Sales By Increasing Speed &#8211; Part 6</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.topclickmedia.co.uk/pay-per-click-advertising-blog/trolls-force-smaller-sites-to-re-think-their-comments-boards' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Trolls force smaller Sites to re think their Comments Boards'>Trolls force smaller Sites to re think their Comments Boards</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The debate surrounding the relative SEO benefits or hindrances of Java script for SEO rages on with the news that the Guardian website has dropped all JavaScript on its comments board. Apparently the decision was taken, at least partly in order to enhance its search engine performance. So, will this help?<span id="more-1352"></span></p>
<p>Well, quite possibly. The pages will probably load quicker, which it’s pretty widely agreed has an effect, also having just one type of code on the page should make the pages easier for the spiders from Google and Bing to crawl. These SEO benefits may be marginal, but even a small improvement over the number of indexable pages that the Guardian has should make a serious difference.</p>
<p>However, in my opinion, the really useful changes will be in terms of user experience. The lack of Javscript on page will mean that the pages will be easily viewable on mobile devices such as iPhones, etc. Also, comments will be more accessible to users.</p>
<p>However, there is also the counter argument that the Guardian is essentially taking a backwards step by doing this, that browsers are increasingly optimising towards JavaScript enabled content. Also, it could be argued that a page constantly refreshing as a site updates its comments board is just as annoying as a slightly overlong load time. </p>
<p>Only time will tell the results of this move. It is however, an interesting test case.</p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.topclickmedia.co.uk/pay-per-click-advertising-blog/guardian-jobs-site-compromised' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Guardian Jobs Site compromised'>Guardian Jobs Site compromised</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.topclickmedia.co.uk/pay-per-click-advertising-blog/7-ways-to-increase-sales-by-increasing-speed-part-6' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: 7 Ways to Increase Sales By Increasing Speed &#8211; Part 6'>7 Ways to Increase Sales By Increasing Speed &#8211; Part 6</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.topclickmedia.co.uk/pay-per-click-advertising-blog/trolls-force-smaller-sites-to-re-think-their-comments-boards' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Trolls force smaller Sites to re think their Comments Boards'>Trolls force smaller Sites to re think their Comments Boards</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.topclickmedia.co.uk/pay-per-click-advertising-blog/the-guardian-website-ditches-javascript-for-seo-reasons/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trolls force smaller Sites to re think their Comments Boards</title>
		<link>http://www.topclickmedia.co.uk/pay-per-click-advertising-blog/trolls-force-smaller-sites-to-re-think-their-comments-boards</link>
		<comments>http://www.topclickmedia.co.uk/pay-per-click-advertising-blog/trolls-force-smaller-sites-to-re-think-their-comments-boards#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 10:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Thomas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comments Boards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comments Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trolls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.topclickmedia.co.uk/pay-per-click-advertising-blog/?p=528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Having a comment function on a website has long been seen as a great way to enhance engagement with your viewers. Recently however, smaller sites with fewer personnel have struggled to deal with the downside of allowing anonymous comments. Namely, trolls.

A troll is a user who personally or profanely attacks an individual or group using [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.topclickmedia.co.uk/pay-per-click-advertising-blog/youtube-strive-to-clean-up-their-comments-board' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: YouTube strives to clean up its Comments Board'>YouTube strives to clean up its Comments Board</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.topclickmedia.co.uk/pay-per-click-advertising-blog/the-guardian-website-ditches-javascript-for-seo-reasons' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: The Guardian Website Ditches JavaScript for SEO Reasons'>The Guardian Website Ditches JavaScript for SEO Reasons</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.topclickmedia.co.uk/pay-per-click-advertising-blog/building-a-search-engine-friendly-website-part-3' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Building a Search Engine Friendly Website &#8211; Part 3'>Building a Search Engine Friendly Website &#8211; Part 3</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having a comment function on a website has long been seen as a great way to enhance engagement with your viewers. Recently however, smaller sites with fewer personnel have struggled to deal with the downside of allowing anonymous comments. Namely, trolls.<br />
<span id="more-528"></span><br />
A troll is a user who personally or profanely attacks an individual or group using a message board or is wilfully controversial in order to provoke a response. Often these users wish to start an argument or simply needle the regular commenters, safe in the anonymity of the internet.</p>
<p>The name troll can also refer to somebody who is trying to surreptitiously promote their site through a message board by posting links, regardless of whether their website is relevant to the discussion. This is a growing trend and can be seen, to some extent, across many popular message boards.</p>
<p>Numerous sites, including popular Boston blog, Universal Hub, have now forced users to register before leaving responses. This doesn’t stop the problem entirely, though it does throw up an extra boundary to people who just want to link to their own site. It also forces Trolls to take some degree of responsibility for their words, since they now have an account, which can be banned or, in some instances, messaged by the site administrators.</p>
<p>Other sites have become so annoyed with irrelevant or offensive content that they have simply discontinued comments altogether.</p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.topclickmedia.co.uk/pay-per-click-advertising-blog/youtube-strive-to-clean-up-their-comments-board' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: YouTube strives to clean up its Comments Board'>YouTube strives to clean up its Comments Board</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.topclickmedia.co.uk/pay-per-click-advertising-blog/the-guardian-website-ditches-javascript-for-seo-reasons' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: The Guardian Website Ditches JavaScript for SEO Reasons'>The Guardian Website Ditches JavaScript for SEO Reasons</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.topclickmedia.co.uk/pay-per-click-advertising-blog/building-a-search-engine-friendly-website-part-3' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Building a Search Engine Friendly Website &#8211; Part 3'>Building a Search Engine Friendly Website &#8211; Part 3</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.topclickmedia.co.uk/pay-per-click-advertising-blog/trolls-force-smaller-sites-to-re-think-their-comments-boards/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
